Modernism vs. Post-modernism

I don’t entirely agree with either modernism or post-modernism. I think that both ideas have flaws that do not allow them to accurately describe society. While modernism states that are universal models for the way the world does and should work, post-modernism completely disagrees with this idea. There are certainly models that help us predict what will happen to populations and societies in the future. For example, we have Newton’s Gravity Model, which is very useful and often accurate in predicting future population change. There is also the Demographic Transition Model and Tobler’s First Law of Geography. Post-modernism would argue against the models, because it would say that human behavior cannot be predicted. While these models are never completely accurate (since human behavior cannot be perfectly predicted) they are still generally useful. Humans are creatures of habit, and habits make it possible to make predictions. Post-modernism does not seem to recognize the value or possibility of making semi-accurate predictions. However, modernism seems as though it may put too much value in these models. Even though the models may give a general idea, we cannot trust them blindly, because humans can and do go against predicted behavior. Furthermore, while modernism implies that there are ways that the world should work, I don’t think that this is the case. I would agree more with the post-modernistic idea of diversity. Even though I do think that society has created overarching ideas and perception about beauty and values, I don’t necessarily believe that these ideals are a good thing.

Cost Minimization in the Real World

My dad works in the cell phone section of his company, which has been outsourcing more and more over the years. The outsourcing is how his company implements cost minimization. The location of each step in the process of creating a cell phone is chosen in order to minimize the costs based on labor. The locations are solely based on cost of labor, because the costs of transportation of materials and finished products are relatively minimal. Cell phone materials are relatively easy to ship, as are the finished phones themselves. It is more cost effective to ship these materials farther in order to manufacture the phones with cheaper workers. Because of this, my dad is frequently in contact with people from other countries; he manages a team of engineers from places like Taiwan and Singapore. All these people from different countries are working on the same product. The American engineers make decisions about how the phone should work, what it should do, and what it looks like. Then the engineers in places such as Singapore determine how to actually create the phone. Once this step has been completed, the phones are mass produced in places like China. There is a reason for having these steps located where they are. The phones are thought up and designed by American engineers because this is an American company. These ideas are actually created and made to work in Singapore because the engineers in Singapore do not cost as much as engineers in America. The engineers from Singapore do not have to be paid as much, so having them work on the phones after the ideas have been established is more cost effective. Once a specific phone is complete, it is mass produced in China because, as many other companies know, it is much less expensive to hire laborers in China rather than in America. However, something that I found interesting was the fact that there must be cell phone factories in Mexico. The Mexican government does not allow phones to be sold in the country if they were not manufactured in Mexico, because they are trying to preserve their economy. I’m not sure what the cost differences are between manufacturing in Mexico and manufacturing in China, but even if Mexican manufacturing costs more, it would still be more profitable to have cell phones sold in Mexico rather than not. The potentially higher cost of labor would just be another minimal cost that the company would have to pay in the pursuit of profit.

Segregation Today

Regardless of the Civil Rights Movement or any laws resulting from it, segregation definitely still exists today. A drive through my ordinary suburban area proves it. There is clearly residential segregation in effect. The neighborhood that surrounds my middle school is almost entirely Hispanic. The houses are all about the same size, which would imply that the socioeconomic status of the residents is similar. In contrast to this neighborhood, I live in a neighborhood that is almost entirely Caucasian, with a few Asian and Indian families. Once again, the socioeconomic status of the people in my neighborhood is about the same. Why didn’t the people in my neighborhood choose to live in the neighborhood by my middle school? Why are there not more Hispanic people in my neighborhood? An explanation for this is residential segregation. Many of the students who went to middle school with me were Hispanic students who spoke Spanish in their homes, and celebrated Quinceañeras. Their families still had very strong ties to Mexico. It makes sense that these families would want to live near each other, because they shared a common culture. The neighborhood around my middle school could be considered an enclave; these immigrants were not forced to live there, but chose to, perhaps to support each other in a new place. While the people in my neighborhood do not share a common ethnicity, they still chose to live in my neighborhood for a reason. My neighborhood is not much older than I am, and there are many young families and children in my neighborhood. There is a whole group of 7th grade boys who live in my neighborhood who my brother likes to play with. There are almost many recent high school graduates in my neighborhood. These parallels make it seem as though all of these families where drawn together because of their similarities in family structure.

Vernacular Regions vs. Political Boundaries

I think that the contrasts between politically determined areas, such as state or country boundaries, and vernacular regions are very interesting. Even previous to chapter two, we’ve discussed in class how people with similarities group themselves together. Because we know this, it makes a lot of sense that vernacular regions exist. If people have similarities which cause them to group themselves together, it is logical that they would consider themselves a group or a region, even if the group was not formed entirely on purpose. Vernacular regions also explain why so much variety can exist within a predetermined boundary or area. For example, I would imagine that those living in southern Illinois can probably relate more to the people in nearby Kentucky our southern Missouri than they can to people living in Chicago. After all, during the Civil War era, a significant number of southern Illinois residents supported the Confederate Army even though the state of Illinois was a Union state. People in southern Illinois do not have a Chicago accent; more likely they have a bit of a southern dialect. Illinois residents near in mid- or northern-Illinois would likely describe Illinois to be in the mid-west, but I would suspect that residents of southern Illinois, although perhaps stating that Illinois is a mid-western state because that is the way that it is labeled on regional maps, could identify more accurately with the southern region of the USA. In fact, a map in chapter two actually divides up the country into vernacular region that are not affected by state borders, and the southern-most tip of Illinois is included as part of the south.